« June 2007 | Main | August 2007 »

Entries from July 2007

July 31, 2007

A Harsh Look at President Bush's Foreign Policy...

...from an unexpected source - - the right.  Michael Rubin makes accusations of empty words, broken promises and lack of follow through:

...Too often, the administration has sacrificed long-term credibility for short-term calm. Take Turkey. At the June 2004 NATO summit in Istanbul, President Bush promised Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan that the U.S. military would shut down Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) terrorists in Iraq. He did not. Three years later, the Turks no longer trust U.S. promises and may send their army into Iraqi Kurdistan.

Already the damage to U.S. prestige is severe. Once among America's closest allies, Turkey, according to a Pew Global Attitudes Project poll last month, is the most anti-American country in the world. Only 9% of Turks have a favorable impression of the U.S.; 83% hold the opposite view. Most blame U.S. inaction against the PKK.

On June 24, 2002, Mr. Bush declared, "The United States will not support the establishment of a Palestinian state until its leaders engage in a sustained fight against the terrorists and dismantle their infrastructure." Less than a year later the State Department reversed course, eliminating the cessation of terror as a precondition for engagement. Palestinian terrorism grew.

While the White House condemns Hamas terrorism, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas's Fatah movement, to which Mr. Bush promised a half billion dollars in July, is equally culpable. A year ago Fatah's military wing threatened to "strike at the economic and civilian interests of these countries [the U.S. and Israel], here and abroad," and it claimed responsibility for a rocket attack on the Israeli town of Sderot in June.

Empty promises of accountability encourage terror by diminishing the costs of its embrace.

While terrorists benefit, Arab liberals pay the price for the president's rhetorical reversals. His promise in the second inaugural speech to "support the growth of democratic movements and institutions in every nation and culture" rings hollow as Egyptian police beat, arrest and sodomize protestors rallying to demand the rule of law.

Read more.

What A Fabulous Shot!

Shirl captures the moon.

Most Popular Post?

Well, it's not the all-time most popular, but at the moment, this one seems to be generating a lot of hits.  Boobs and politics - a killer combo.

July 30, 2007

Which Presidential Candidate Shares Your Views?

Okay, here's a really simple way to find out which candidates share your views. This script is composed entirely of data collected by www.2decide.com. Enter your choices below and hit GO to rank the candidates.

Check it out.

Asay4

Kryptonite Words

"Liberals used to be the ones who argued that sending U.S. troops abroad was a small price to pay to stop genocide; now they argue that genocide is a small price to pay to bring U.S. troops home."

What color is your soul painted?

Blue

Your soul is painted the color blue, which embodies the characteristics of peace, patience, understanding, health, tranquility, protection, spiritual awareness, unity, harmony, calmness, coolness, confidence, dependability, loyalty, idealism, tackiness, and wisdom. Blue is the color of the element Water, and is symbolic of the ocean, sleep, twilight, and the sky.

Personality Test Results

Click Here to Take This Quiz

quiz
Quizzes and Personality Tests

Tackiness? Moi?

Via Throwing Bullets

Marvel Super Heroes Commemorative Stamp Set

The US Postal Service has announced the printing of a new commemorative stamp set which includes pictures of the Incredible Hulk, Spiderman, Captain America and more.  The author and creator of the great majority of Marvel characters, Stan Lee, was the son of Jewish immigrants. 

The USPS reports:

With these 20 colorful stamps, the U.S. Postal Service salutes stars from the world of Marvel Comics. For decades, Super Heroes have been synonymous with the comic book medium. Their adventures have provided an escape from every day life and demonstrate that individuals can make a difference. Comic books aren't simply "kid stuff" — adults have always been among their readers, and the form has attracted its share of serious artists and writers. And Super Heroes have responded to social and political issues from their beginnings.

Ten stamps on the pane of 20 are portraits of individual Marvel characters: Captain America, Elektra, Iron Man, Silver Surfer, Spider-Man, Spider-Woman, Sub-Mariner, The Incredible Hulk, The Thing and Wolverine.

Hat tip: Draftervoi, who writes:

Most of the characters portrayed were created by Jewish Americans....so many so that it's easier to point out the characters that WEREN'T created by Jews:  Electra, Submariner and Spiderwoman.    Everything else, Jewish-American creativity was involved.

I was an Archie/Jughead/Betty/Veronica fan myself.  Also, Richie Rich and the lesser known Little Lotta. I did not read Marvel comics, but I did watch a lot of the original Superman -  a character also created by Jewish-Americans - on TV.

I do find the connection between Jews and superheroes to be an interesting concept though. America was quite the "superhero" to Jews in the early part of the 20th century.  Characters such as Jerry Seigel and Joe Shuster's Superman and Lee's Captain America seem to me to be a reflection of the great esteem and gratitude in which America was held by Jewish-Americans of my parent's and grandparents' generations.   

Technical Developments in US Self-Defense: Stymied By Congress

Democrat-controlled congress is standing in the way of testing an invaluable new defense weapon. Not a first strike weapon, it is designed only as defense against incoming nuclear missiles.  Here is a prime reason that it is extremely unlikely that I will ever vote for a Democrat again.  They do not take care of us defensively, keeping their heads too deeply buried up their multi-cultural read ends.  In my view, just in case some folks are NOT interested in joining hands and singing Kumbaya (gee, who could imagine such a thing?), it might be a good idea to be prepared.

Gabriel Schoenfeld reports:

The actual development and testing of an Airborne Laser was first funded in 1996, and the system has made considerable progress in the decade since. Earlier this month, an aircraft equipped with a low-powered laser was able to simulate the operation of a chemical high-powered laser of the kind that is already quite workable on the ground. Here, according to airforce-technology.com,  is how that high-power system would work:

The primary laser beam is generated by a megawatt Chemical Oxygen Iodine Laser (COIL) located at the rear of the fuselage, which lases at 1.315 micron wavelength. The high-power laser beam travels toward the front of the aircraft through a pipe. The pipe passes through a Station 1000 bulkhead / airlock, which separates the rear fuselage from the forward cabins. The high-power beam passes through the fine-beam control system mounted on a vibration isolated optical bench. Beam pointing is achieved with very fast, lightweight steering mirrors, which are tilted to follow the target missile.

When the laser beam hits the target missile, it will heat a spot on its fuel tank, causing catastrophic failure in the missile during its boost phase, leading it to fall back with a bang onto the country that launched it.

Schoenfeld notes that the delay in testing is not being discussed in the MSM at all and wonders why.

Read the whole thing.

It's Musical Monday...

...at SoccerDad.  Can you guess that tune and the artist - without googling the lyrics?

Have You Heard the Latest Conspiracy Theory?

Joos are responsible for the conflict in Darfur:

Sudan's defense minister, Abdel Rahim Mohamed Hussein, has accused "24 Jewish organizations" of "fueling the conflict in Darfur" last week in an interview with a Saudi newspaper.

Sudanese government officials are quite shocked that Sudanese refugees are leaving and making new homes in Israel.

Hmmmm.  How are the Joos convincing them to leave?

Are they having them read the latest adventures of Harry Potter, perhaps?

No - seems it's a sneaky, underhanded conspiracy via offer of food, shelter and safe haven:

The Sudan Tribune quoted a Sudanese refugee as telling al-Jazeera television: "We were surprised when we came here. We met good people, who welcomed us and gave us food. We feel that we are extremely happy. We hope that the Israeli government would find a solution for us and our children. We came here to look for a better place."

Meanwhile, in the US, a number of Jewish organizations have attempted to raise awareness over the plight of Sudanese citizens who face mass killings and ethnic cleansing from the Sudanese government. Some 20 Jewish organizations joined the 'Save Darfur Coalition,' along with other religious communities and American civil rights groups.

Evangelical Christian Support For Israel

Eroding?

July 28, 2007

Hillary Clinton's Cleavage

If Clinton wants to be taken seriously, the right way to have handled any discussion about the appearance of her cleavage on the campaign trail would have been to ignore it, and not get all weepy and victom-y about it.  Ms. Clinton could take a page from George Bush on how to handle oneself when one feels attacked. He's done a superb job of sticking to the issues and remaining dignified in the face of real nastiness from his political opponents.  Truly, the discussion of Clinton's cleavage hardly falls into the category as a "political attack" to begin with, as far as I am concerned. The issue is silly and a big yawn and if she were smart, she'd have stuck to her campaign points and left it alone. As acidly pointed out by Don Surber, her husband did more to disrespect women and coarsen the culture than anyone in recent memory - certainly far more than has Robin Givahn, the WaPo fashion columnist who originally aired the cleavage story.

July 27, 2007

Star Trek News

The next Star Trek movie will come out in December of 2008. Leonard Nimoy has agreed to be in it, and William Shatner may have a part as well:

Leonard Nimoy isn't through with Spock yet.

The 76-year-old actor will don his famous pointy ears again to play the role in an upcoming "Star Trek" film due out Christmas 2008.

"This is really going to be a great movie. And I don't say things like that lightly," Nimoy told a gathering of 6,500 fans Thursday at Comic-Con, the nation's largest pop-culture convention.

He greeted the crowd with a Vulcan salute.

Nimoy was joined by the newly named young Spock, "Heroes" star Zachary Quinto, who bears an uncanny resemblance to Nimoy.

...While the character of Captain Kirk has yet to be cast, Abrams said that William Shatner, who played the role in the original TV series, would likely also have a part in the film.

"It has to be worthy, of him and of you," Abrams told fans, adding that production is slated to begin in November.

One fan asked Nimoy what he thought of his "replacement."

"It was logical," the actor said dryly. He then closed with Spock's classic line: "Live long and prosper."

The Israeli Airforce Flies Over Auschwitz

This gave me goosebumps:

Never again should Jews be so weak that their very weakness tempts others to oppress them.

- Rabbi Irving Greenberg

July 26, 2007

What We Are Eating For Dinner Tonight

FYI:  The following is not a kosher recipe. 

Saute a diced up onion, add canned diced tomatoes with their juice (about 1.5 lbs) and 2 containers of Maya Kaimal's Vindaloo sauce (I bought mine from the refrigerated section of Fresh Fields/Whole Foods), and about 3 lbs of cut up fish - some suggestions are  a combination of salmon, swordfish, shelled and cleaned shrimp, scallops, steamers, or king crab legs.  Simmer it all together in a big soup pot until everything is cooked through and serve with some crusty sour dough bread and a nice salad.

Fantastic. It makes a huge pot and lasts for days.

Vindaloo

Just Because it Made Me Laugh

Gse_multipart34732

Found at Posts From Helms Deep

Is This Offensive?

Mark asks.  What do you think?  

This Just in: Harry Potter Involved in ZIONIST Plot!

There used to be a TV show eons ago called "One Step Beyond."  Something in the stupidity of the accusation that Harry Potter is a part of a zionist plot to "disrupt the minds of young people" made me think of it.  The show's tagline was:

"What you are about to see is a matter of human record. Explain it: we cannot. Disprove it: we cannot. We simply invite you to explore with us the amazing world of the Unknown ... to take that One Step ... Beyond."

In this case, start out at completely out to lunch.  Then, take one step beyond that.  Wind up inside the mind of (dun, dun, dun or doo-doo-doo-doo, doo-doo-doo-doo, which ever you prefer for portentious surrealist theme music) Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. 

Explain it:  I cannot. I simply invite you to explore with me the amazing world of one step...beyond.  

(HT: Daled Amos)

The Existence of God

A quote found in the book "Jewish Wisdom" by Rabbi Joseph Telushkin written in the 11th century by philosopher and rabbi Bahya ibn Pakuda states:

Do you not realize that if ink were poured out accidentally on a sheet of paper, it would be impossible that proper writing should result, or legible lines such as written with a pen?...Now, if we find it impossible to reconcile ourselves with the idea that written forms can make themselves, how is it possible to say, when we see something more subtle in form [and] more difficult to create...that it was made without the purpose, power and wisdom of a mighty designer?

Morality without God

Another quote from Telushkin's book, this one by Irving Kristol in American Jews and the Separationist Faith:

[Those of us in the Western world who are secular] have found ourselves baffled by the Nietzschean challenge: if God is really dead, by what authority do we say that any particular practice is prohibited or permitted?  Pure reason alone cannot tell us that incest is wrong; indeed, the only argument against bestiality these days is that, since we cannot know whether the animals enjoy it or not, it is a violation of "animal rights."

July 25, 2007

D07722_3

The Cool and Beautiful Young Women of the IDF

Whether or not America should have a moral war policy, self-absorbed boomers could at least stop deluding themselves that they have a moral peace policy.  - Mark Steyn

Don't Be a Lamb Going Quietly to the Slaughter - Updated

Cellphonesheep

I found the above picture on Hermit's blog, and it spoke volumes to me about history and the situation in the world today.  Jews were defenseless sheep during WW2.  What do we learn from that?  Well, in my view, we are meant to defend ourselves and we are meant to forcefully fight evil.   

Evil and irrational hatred do not respond to reason, and those who hate do not care if you are defenseless.  If you are in their way, they will run you over. We can't waste time asking questions about their culture or psyches or the background of hatred so great they wish to see us dead - they won't spend a minute worrying about our psyches or background.   

Pacifism, passivity, weakness, and appeasement aid and abet baseless hatred and promote the murder of the defenseless.

Credit where it is due:

Ok - yes. Quite right. I was reminded in email that, as Daled Amos writes, Jews DID fight back. (HT: SoccerDad)   

Tick, Tick, Tick, Tick, Tick, Tick....

...it's quarter to midnight.  Are we prepared for this? Seems like we are just going to roll over, pull the covers over our heads and let it happen:

Iran: "We Have Enough Centrifuges to Go to a Bomb" - Anne Penketh
A senior Iranian official said that with almost 3,000 centrifuges now running at Natanz, "we have at the moment enough centrifuges to go to a bomb." (Independent-UK)

Good News

Trial Begins for Islamic Charity Charged with Funneling Money to Hamas - Robert Barnes
Federal prosecutors opened their case Tuesday against what was once the nation's largest Islamic charity, arguing that the Texas-based Holy Land Foundation knowingly sent at least $12 million to Hamas, the militant Palestinian group officially designated as a terrorist organization by the U.S. government. Administration officials say the trial is an important battle in the fight to cut off funding to terrorists. Some 300 individuals and groups were named in the indictment as unindicted co-conspirators, including the Council on American-Islamic Relations.
    The indictment charges that the foundation in part directed the money to take care of the families of suicide bombers, an action to "effectively reward past, and encourage future, suicide bombings and terrorist activities." Assistant U.S. Attorney James Jacks said the foundation and defendants shared Hamas' goal of the destruction of Israel. (Washington Post)

Yeah.  Get em.  Stomp em.  In the air, on land, and sea and in the courtroom too.

The Tide - Beginning to Turn?

  Muslim Rejection of Suicide Attacks on the Rise - Except Among Palestinians - Harry Dunphy (Washington Times)
    Muslims around the world increasingly reject suicide bombings, according to a survey of international attitudes in 47 countries released Tuesday by the Pew Research Center.
    The percentage of Jordanian Muslims who have confidence in bin Laden as a world leader fell 36 points to 20% since 2003, while the proportion who say suicide bombing is sometimes or always justified dropped 20 points to 23%.
    Other countries where support for bin Laden declined are Lebanon, Indonesia, Turkey, Pakistan and Kuwait.
    But support for suicide bombings is widespread among Palestinians, the report said, with 41% asserting that such attacks are often justified while another 29% say they can sometimes be justified.
    Only 6% of Palestinians say such attacks are never justified - the smallest percentage in any Muslim public surveyed.
    Read Summary of Survey (Pew Global Attitudes Project)

If they think the strategy works, they will use it.  Why wouldn't they? It must be proven to them that it doesn't. Israel should not give an inch.  No more prisoners, no more land. 

Breaking News

Huge gas explosion in Dallas.  Live online coverage here.

Back to Blogging

I've been involved in a religious discussion on a message board, and have been too busy to blog.  Time to get back to business.

I only watched a small piece of the YouTube debates - had no patience to listen to more from the Democrats, quite honestly.  They will not convince me of anything, I do not agree with them, why subject myself to it? I was curious about Hillary Clinton though - who sources said made the best showing - head and shoulders above the other Democratic candidates. The piece I saw was one in which Clinton was asked if she thought she was a liberal, and what did that term mean? She responded by rejecting the liberal label and calling herself a modern American Progressive.

<

I may be wrong, but I've always thought that "progressives" were the outer fringe of liberalism - the most liberal of the liberals, the "moonbats" and most weirdly expressive branch of the liberal tree. I was a little surprised that Clinton aligned herself with them, but I suppose they are part of the base that she needs to court?  I know they are not pleased with her views on Iraq - perhaps she needs to use the label in order to convince them that she is sympathetic to their views.

Well, I am thinking that Ms. Clinton may wish to rethink her strategy - unless of course she actually likes the thought of being aligned with this crowd?

The Hillary Clinton for President Campaign celebrated the opening of its new San Francisco headquarters with a launch party that coincided with the Democratic presidential debate on July 23, 2007. The radical activist groups Breasts Not Bombs and Code Pink heard about the event and decided it would be a good opportunity to stage a surprise topless protest to publicize their anti-war message.

Pictures and more (Warning: NSFW and may be frightening to adults, children and other living things).

July 23, 2007

The Horror of Chinese Communism

Don't tell me that we've learned anything from history. We don't even know enough about history to learn from it.

If you read nothing else today, you simply must read this recounting of what it was like in China during the years under the dictatorship of Mao Zedong.  Few know.

How bad did it get? [In] 1968 an 18-year-old member of the Red Guard, Wei Jingsheng, took refuge with a family in a village of Anhui, and here he lived to write about what he saw:

"We walked along beside the village… Before my eyes, among the weeds, rose up one of the scenes I had been told about, one of the banquets at which the families had swapped children in order to eat them. I could see the worried faces of the families as they chewed the flesh of other people's children. The children who were chasing butterflies in a nearby field seemed to be the reincarnation of the children devoured by their parents. I felt sorry for the children but not as sorry as I felt for their parents. What had made them swallow that human flesh, amidst the tears and grief of others — flesh that they would never have imagined tasting, even in their worst nightmares?"

What light does this shed on China's situation today?  Click the link above to read more.

Not That it Matters to Anyone But Me...

I am an aunt again! My SIL delivered twin boys via c-section at 1:30 am.  The last baby in our family was born 15 years ago, and we are all very excited.  They were born 5 weeks early and are 5 lbs and 4 lbs and change each.  Must be so tiny - I can't even imagine - my children were all between 7 and 8 lbs and they seemed pretty small to me. So far, they seem to be doing ok - I hope there are no complications.

 

July 20, 2007

Regarding the Clintons Making Goo-Goo Eyes

I so agree that the Clinton's current cooing is such a turn-off.   Can you imagine Margaret Thatcher and Dennis making goo-goo eyes at each other?  Of course not  Hillary either plays it girl-y when she is with Big Bill or school marmish when she is being a self-righteous policy wonk, and both can hit the wrong note.   What I  think is the best stance for female politicians who want to be leaders is to be lady-like and dignified.  That certainly was good enough for Thatcher.   - Myrna Blyth

How Do We Diagnose a World War as Opposed to a Garden Variety Single Foe Skirmish?

Well, to begin with, in a world war, one has to fight more than one enemy simultaneously.  This idea has not yet dawned on some.  Cliff May writes:

It would be nice — or at least more convenient — if America could fight just one enemy at a time. But that’s seldom how it works.

World War II was called a world war for a reason: President Roosevelt might have preferred to take on only Imperial Japan, the nation that had attacked us. Instead, he had to lead the country into battle also against Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy. He had to fight not only in the Pacific but in North Africa and Europe as well.

It’s astonishing how many otherwise smart people seem incapable of grasping this reality. Many have been making the peculiar argument that we shouldn’t worry too much about al Qaeda in Iraq — because it’s somehow different from al Qaeda Not in Iraq. Consider the question a reporter asked of President Bush at a recent press conference:

But, sir …what evidence can you present to the American people that the people who attacked the United States on September the 11th are, in fact, the same people who are responsible for the bombings taking place in Iraq? What evidence can you present? And also, are you saying, sir, that al Qaeda in Iraq is the same organization being run by Osama bin Laden, himself?

Can you imagine, President Roosevelt being asked: But, sir … what evidence can you present to the American people that the people who attacked the United States on December 7th are, in fact, the same people who are responsible for the so-called “blitz” bombings now taking place in London? What evidence can you present? And also, are you saying, sir, that those attacking London belong to the same organization as do those Japanese who are allegedly responsible for the attack on Pearl Harbor?

...So yes, America has a long list of “formidable and disruptive” enemies — in Iraq and elsewhere. That’s not just a “narrative.” It’s the truth — and it ought at least to be taken into account by those debating from which battlefields Americans should flee.

The question is, as it has been since moment one of this conflict,  how do we get them to remove their blinders? The truth is something with which they don't seem to have any interest in dealing.

July 19, 2007

Birds Pay Tribute to Hitchcock

July 17, 2007

Myths and Realities of the George W. Bush Presidency

I think that President Bush has got one thing very much right, which is that Arab-Islamic terrorism is a symptom that something is rotten in the Middle East. If anything, his failures in Iraq and Palestine are due to underestimating the degree of rot. For all the allegations of his lack of intellect, George Bush is a brainiac compared to people who want to see terrorism as a symptom of something rotten in the United States or Israel. - Arnold Kling

Cape May

I had some surgery done yesterday - (nothing I feel like discussing and nothing to do with the big "C") but just to let you know, blogging will remain slow for a bit until I am back up to par. 

Below are some pics of Cape May from last week to fill some empty space on this page.  We had a very interesting week - we rented a huge house and invited lots of people who came and went in shifts, including family - MIL, BILs, SILs, etc and old college roomates.  It was fun but not as relaxing as usual because I felt like I had to play hostess and make sure everyone was having a good time and had all they needed. Also, we brought my parents along, and we were able to see up close how slowed down they are.  As soon as I am able, I am going to find them a retirement home.  They are slowing down mentally as well as physically and I am really concerned about them being on their own.  They get mad ay me whenever I bring it up, but it's reached the point where I think I have to make the decision for them.

Anyway - here are some of the happy thoughts of the trip and a good taste of the flavor ofthe area.  We've come to Cape May 14 of the past 16 summers, and there's a good reason for it - the place could not be anymore charming with beautiful beaches, Victorian gingerbread architecture and absolutely fabulous reastaurants.  Everyone there seems to be into gardening or else there's something in the sea air - the flowers were amazing:

Dsc01383b

Dsc01388b 

Dsc01389b_2

Dsc01391b

Click to enlarge the rest:

Dsc01393b_3

Dsc01399b

Dsc01400b

Dsc01401b

Dsc01402b_2

Dsc01404b

Dsc01408b

Dsc01409b

Dsc01410b   

Dsc01414b

Dsc01415b

Dsc01407b 

Dsc01413b_2

Dsc01419b

Husband and I got up and stole away on our own in the early morning fog:

Dsc01422b

Dsc01430b 

Dsc01431b

Dsc01439b

Husband engaged in his favorite pastime - reading the WSJ on the beach:

Dsc01442b

Dsc014451bb

The sun coming through the clouds, which mostly disappeared by 10 am:

Dsc01446b 

Dsc01448b

Dsc01453b

Dsc01454b   

Dsc01455b

Dsc01457b 

Dsc01463b

Dsc01471b 

Dsc01482b

Dsc01488b

July 06, 2007

Blogging Hiatus

Heading out of town in the morning.  Not sure if I will have internet access while I am gone.  Back in a week or so. Take care, one and all. 

Q&A

I have been interviewed by Mark of Knockin' on the Golden Door, who asked me some really thought provoking questions:

1.  Would you ever consider making aliyah?

Consider it?  Yes.  Will I ever do it?  The chances are extremely slim.

2.  If so, why?  If not, why not? (not really two questions, just depends on your answer to #1)

A good deal of my heart and soul is over there fighting the good fight alongside the Israelis. Religiously, morally, culturally, and emotionally - I believe that Eretz Yisrael belongs to the Jews, and I believe that Jews belong to Eretz Yisrael. 

At this point, if this were live and in person, I would burst into a melodramatic, heartfelt, low-tenor operatic rendition of the theme from the movie "Exodus:"

This land is mine, God gave this land to me
This brave and ancient land to me!!
And when the morning sun reveals her hills and plains,
Then I see a land where children can run free.

So take my hand and walk this land with me.
And walk this lovely land with me!
Though I am just a man, when you are by my side,
With the help of God, I know I can be strong.

[brief instrumental interlude]

Though I am just a man, when you are by my side,
With the help of God, I know I can be strong
To make this land our home
If I must fight, I'll fight to make this land our own
Until I die, this land is mine.

You'll never guess who wrote those lyrics, by the way. 

Pat Boone - back in 1961.

Anyway, if I were younger - if I had no one depending on me, I'd be there in a heartbeat.  I'd join the army, I'd be more religiously observant, and I'd live a very different life.  But, things did not play out that way.  I was not at all religious when I was young.  It was only around the time my eldest son became Bar Mitzvah that the spirituality light turned on for me, which was very dim in the beginning and only in the past 5 years has it grown brighter. 

In short, however: My husband and children and my parents are here, and they have no desire to move to Israel. I am not going anywhere without them.   

At the same time, I know that if I ever did move to Israel, I would miss the US tremendously. I believe in the mission and philosophy of the great American "experiment."  Democracy feels like a very religious method of governing to me.  The Constitution is our Bible, and people debate over it like Torah scholars. Anti-Americanism be damned - I see only great goodness coming from the American people.  We are not perfect, but we want the best for the world and there hasn't been any government nor any people that has done more for the modern world than the US.

If not Israel, there is no where on this planet I'd rather be than the US, and I am extremely loyal and hold this country and my fellow citizens in great esteem.   

3.  Why do you support a two-state solution?

Who said that I support a two-state solution? I supported a two-state solution for years and I suppose that practicality demands that it must be, but I really think the Israelis should govern both Gaza and the West Bank.  I know that people think this makes me a greedy grasping Jew, but those people would think that no matter what I said.

What I want for the future has nothing to do with imperialism or greediness.   

Disengagement from Gaza has shown us that the Palestinians are in no condition to govern or take care of themselves.  I have read that many Palestinians wish the Israelis to return, and I don't blame them.  Until the Arab/Muslim world renounces violence and embraces tolerance for other religions and freedom for its women, I personally don't think they ought to govern an outhouse in the desert.

I feel the same way about each and every Arab country where Islamofascism grows unchecked, whether the government leaders cower in fear from it or whether they are part of the cancer themselves.

We and the rest of the world have a choice - allow them to do what they will while we live with the consequences, or else, we intervene and impose our own will.

I can see pros and cons to both arguments, but personally  I believe in grabbing the bull by the horns and being pro-active - even moreso as Iran's nuclear weapons plans come closer to fruition.  But that would require the support of everyone outside of the Arab world.  It would require cooperation.  It would require strength and determination.  It would require guts and courage. It would require uniting together and believing in our own goodness and being capable of agreeing upon what "goodness" is.  It would require strong leadership, it would require an effective communicator, and it would require maturity and adulthood on the part of all of us.  It would require great sacrifice.

I don't want to see us owning them, obliterating Muslim culture, taking their oil or land, or enslaving them.  What I do want is for us force the modern world down their throats until they stop and taste it for a minute and realize it's the best meal they've ever had.  But this is not going to happen overnight and it's not going to happen without force being applied and without our shutting every potential door of escape from our will.

Plain and simple:  We have to be cruel to be kind.

I don't think we have what it takes to do this right now.  Some hideous unfortunate thing, comparable to another 9/11 might have to happen first.  And even then, some will still be blaming themselves and the West for Arab anger and will think that the victims involved deserved their fate. And they will want to twist themselves into knots trying to appease the unnappeasable, wearing blinders to shield themselves from recognizing the dangers that require them to be courageous and strong.

4.  Do you regard Judaism as more a religion or a philosophy?

Well, it's both. One can follow Jewish philosophy without believing it religiously.  But believing adds a layer of meaning which I personally did not understand/perceive until recently.

Philosophy without belief removes the concept of transcendence, the great and wonderful endeavor of growing beyond our human failings.   

Philosophically, I think it's much healthier for us all to believe that man is not the best the universe has to offer. Philosophically from my point of view, it makes more sense to believe religiously.

5.  Why do fools fall in love?  Yeah, #5 is silly, but the rest sure aren't light, are they?

Ah, a silly one.  Thank goodness, Mark.  My little brain is killing me from all this thinking.

Hormones.  We have hormones and they turn us all into fools.  But thank God for them because love is a wonderful part of being human.

Thanks, Mark. Terrific questions!

July 05, 2007

Sousa Would Have Been Proud

If I'd have had the time, I'd have posted this yesterday.  Follow the link to several entertainingly different YouTube versions of John Phillip Sousa's fabulous "Stars and Stripes Forever" - from an adorable rendition by a barbershop quartet (you get to hear the rarely heard words), to banjo to electric guitar to just the piccolo part and more.  Turn the sound up and celebrate the 4th all over again!

07_07_03_fireworksx

July 04, 2007

Independence Day

Declarationscan

IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America

When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their Public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected, whereby the Legislative Powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury:

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:

For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these united Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. — And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.

John Hancock

New Hampshire:
Josiah Bartlett, William Whipple, Matthew Thornton

Massachusetts:
John Hancock, Samuel Adams, John Adams, Robert Treat Paine, Elbridge Gerry

Rhode Island:
Stephen Hopkins, William Ellery

Connecticut:
Roger Sherman, Samuel Huntington, William Williams, Oliver Wolcott

New York:
William Floyd, Philip Livingston, Francis Lewis, Lewis Morris

New Jersey:
Richard Stockton, John Witherspoon, Francis Hopkinson, John Hart, Abraham Clark

Pennsylvania:
Robert Morris, Benjamin Rush, Benjamin Franklin, John Morton, George Clymer, James Smith, George Taylor, James Wilson, George Ross

Delaware:
Caesar Rodney, George Read, Thomas McKean

Maryland:
Samuel Chase, William Paca, Thomas Stone, Charles Carroll of Carrollton

Virginia:
George Wythe, Richard Henry Lee, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Harrison, Thomas Nelson, Jr., Francis Lightfoot Lee, Carter Braxton

North Carolina:
William Hooper, Joseph Hewes, John Penn

South Carolina:
Edward Rutledge, Thomas Heyward, Jr., Thomas Lynch, Jr., Arthur Middleton

Georgia:
Button Gwinnett, Lyman Hall, George Walton

Fireworkswashingtondc2_2

July 03, 2007

In Other Words, it's a Lie

aspersion, backbiting, calumniation, calumny, complete distortion of the facts, corker, deceit, deception, defamation, detraction, dishonesty, disinformation, distortion, evasion, fable, fabrication, falsehood, falseness, falsification, falsity, fib, fiction, fish story, forgery, fraudulence, guile, hyperbole, inaccuracy, invention, libel, mendacity, misrepresentation, misstatement, myth, obloquy, perjury, prevarication, revilement, reviling, slander, subterfuge, tale, tall story, terminological inexactitude, vilification, white lie, whopper.

Really and truly total bullshit.